Todd Andrews won the "Most Improved Player Award" in the United States Chess League last season. Using the USCL rating system I developed, one thing we can check is whether this award was justified.
The easiest measure of this is the greatest difference between the rating on the final 2006 list and the rating on the final 2007 list. We have to set a one criterion, however; the player must have played a minimum of three games in 2007 in order to be eligible for consideration, as well as at least three in 2006 or earlier. (Remember also that the USCL ratings are dependent to some degree on how the player's results contributed to the team's results.)
So, did Todd Andrews have the greatest difference between these two lists? No! That honor goes to Davorin Kuljasevic, who gained 106 points from 2006 to 2007. Andrews gained 101 points in the 2007 season.
Here are the top five most improved players from 2006 to 2007, according to the USCL rating list.
1. Davorin Kuljasevic +106 (2434 to 2540)
2. Todd Andrews +101 (2307 to 2408)
3. Mackensie Molner +74 (2266 to 2339)
4. Jonathan Schroer +55 (2338 to 2393)
5. Marcel Martinez +41 (2345 to 2386)
In an upcoming post, we'll try and figure out the rookie of the year award.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
Seems a little unfair to me, as Kuljasevic played only 4 games in 2006, so it didn't really give him a fair chance to establish a rating with a large enough sample size. I believe Andrews played 8 or 9 games.
It's important to have played a good amount the previous season (at least 5 games) to win this award IMO.
Do you know what I won for this award? Diddly-squat...so go ahead and give it to someone else.
WOW Todd, first you go off saying how it's unfair that people put so much pressure on you, and then now you expect to win something for an award?
Good Grief!!!!
I vote for Todd Andrews to be God.
Post a Comment