A few days ago in this blog entry, using the USCL rating system I developed, whether Todd Andrews should have won the USCL's Most Improved Player award. Today, I examine whether Jorge Sammour-Hasbun of the Boston Blitz should have won the Rookie of the Year award.
Sammour-Hasbun had a fantastic year in the USCL. He won six and drew two, without a loss. (Indeed his results in other tournaments have been similarly great; he just repeated as champion of the Dos Hermanas tournament - which was an incredible feat, given the competition he knocked out on the way there.)
But was he really the USCL's rookie of the year? How should that even be defined?
Let's start with the USCL rating system. One measure of whether a player is the rookie of the year is comparing the player's initial assigned rating and the player's rating at the end of the year, on the final 2007 list, and looking for the greatest difference. Remember that initial ratings are assigned by the board on which the player first competed.
Given that criterion, the rookie of the year would be the New York Knights' Irina Zenyuk (also spelled Iryna - I don't know what she prefers). She gained 136 points from her initial rating, while Sammour-Hasbun gained 125. Zenyuk also had an excellent year, with four wins, three draws, and a single loss.
Here are the top five rookies of 2007. They must have played a minimum of three games in 2007 to be included on this list.
1. Irina Zenyuk 2386 (+136, started at 2250, board 4)
2. Jorge Sammour-Hasbun 2575 (+125, started at 2450, board 2)
3. Eric Rodriguez 2370 (+120, started at 2250, board 4)
4. Chris Williams 2363 (+113, started at 2250, board 4)
5. Francisco Guadalupe 2352 (+102, started at 2250, board 4)
What rookie will take the award this year?
Showing posts with label 2007. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2007. Show all posts
Monday, April 07, 2008
Friday, April 04, 2008
Was Todd Andrews the USCL's most improved player?
Todd Andrews won the "Most Improved Player Award" in the United States Chess League last season. Using the USCL rating system I developed, one thing we can check is whether this award was justified.
The easiest measure of this is the greatest difference between the rating on the final 2006 list and the rating on the final 2007 list. We have to set a one criterion, however; the player must have played a minimum of three games in 2007 in order to be eligible for consideration, as well as at least three in 2006 or earlier. (Remember also that the USCL ratings are dependent to some degree on how the player's results contributed to the team's results.)
So, did Todd Andrews have the greatest difference between these two lists? No! That honor goes to Davorin Kuljasevic, who gained 106 points from 2006 to 2007. Andrews gained 101 points in the 2007 season.
Here are the top five most improved players from 2006 to 2007, according to the USCL rating list.
1. Davorin Kuljasevic +106 (2434 to 2540)
2. Todd Andrews +101 (2307 to 2408)
3. Mackensie Molner +74 (2266 to 2339)
4. Jonathan Schroer +55 (2338 to 2393)
5. Marcel Martinez +41 (2345 to 2386)
In an upcoming post, we'll try and figure out the rookie of the year award.
The easiest measure of this is the greatest difference between the rating on the final 2006 list and the rating on the final 2007 list. We have to set a one criterion, however; the player must have played a minimum of three games in 2007 in order to be eligible for consideration, as well as at least three in 2006 or earlier. (Remember also that the USCL ratings are dependent to some degree on how the player's results contributed to the team's results.)
So, did Todd Andrews have the greatest difference between these two lists? No! That honor goes to Davorin Kuljasevic, who gained 106 points from 2006 to 2007. Andrews gained 101 points in the 2007 season.
Here are the top five most improved players from 2006 to 2007, according to the USCL rating list.
1. Davorin Kuljasevic +106 (2434 to 2540)
2. Todd Andrews +101 (2307 to 2408)
3. Mackensie Molner +74 (2266 to 2339)
4. Jonathan Schroer +55 (2338 to 2393)
5. Marcel Martinez +41 (2345 to 2386)
In an upcoming post, we'll try and figure out the rookie of the year award.
Labels:
2007,
most improved,
united states chess league
Friday, March 21, 2008
USCL Ratings (with 2007 Final List)

I have independently created a United States Chess League rating system that takes into several elements that other rating systems do not. Most importantly, the USCL ratings take into account that players are part of a team, and their strategy about how to conclude their individual games depend on the games situations of their teammates.
Here is an overview of the USCL rating system.
1. Modified Glicko
Rating calculations are based on the Glicko system, with some minor modifications. These modifications are as follows:
(a) Maximum RD is 100 (not 350);
(b) Ratings are updated after every game;
(c) At the end of each season, each RD is modified by increasing it 1/2 its distance to 100. For example, if a player's RD is 40, then the new RD is 40+((100-40)/2) or 40+(30) or 70. This eliminates step 1b in the Glicko process.
2. Initial Ratings Based on Board
Initial ratings for each player are based on which board they played the first time they played in a USCL match. Players who were Board 1 start with an initial rating of 2550; Board 2, 2450; Board 3, 2350; Board 4, 2250. All are set with an RD (ratings deviation) of 100.
3. Expected Score Depends on Color
Expected score from each game is modified by the color each player has. An initial investigation showed that, in the USCL, the performance rating of a player with the White pieces is about 72 points higher than the performance rating of a player with the Black pieces. Therefore, when calculating expected score of a games between two players, we temporarily add 36 points to White's rating, and subtract 36 points from Black's rating.
4. All Games Rated with Equal Weight
All games, including playoff games and blitz tiebreak games, were given equal weight in the ratings.
5. Scores for Draws Depend on Team Result
In team chess, where the goal of the team is to win the match (with 2.5/4 points or more, or 2/4 in a match with draw odds), individual results can be skewed by the circumstances of the match situation. For example, if it looks like your team is about to win two games and lose one game, winning the match comes down to what happens on your board. Suppose that in your game you have a moderate advantage, but the position is dynamic and unstable. In such a case, you might decide to trade all your pieces to reach a dead drawn endgame, so that you will draw the game and clinch the match for your team. This is fundamentally a good result for your team, as your will win the match.
Therefore, the result of the team match is considered when assigning scores for individual players' draws. If the final team match is drawn, each player who drew gets 1/2 point. If a team wins, all the players on the winning team who drew their games get 2/3 point each. Conversely, all the players on a losing team who drew their games get 1/3 point each. (Wins are still 1 and losses are still 0, regardless of the team match score.) Note that these point assignments are only for rating calculations only.
Final 2007 United States Chess League Rating List
- Every game in every season of the USCL was rated, not just 2007.
- Only players who were played at least one game in 2007 (i.e., active) are included in the list.
- Players must have played at least three games in the history of the USCL to be included in the list.
- While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, re-rating might occur to correct any mistakes.
1 | 2591 Sergey Kudrin |
2 | 2589 Vinay Bhat |
3 | 2586 Patrick Wolff |
4 | 2581 Larry Christiansen |
5 | 2580 Hikaru Nakamura |
6 | 2579 Jorge Sammour-Hasbun |
7 | 2576 Joel Benjamin |
8 | 2571 Drasko Boskovic |
9 | 2569 Gregory Serper |
10 | 2566 Julio Becerra |
11 | 2543 Davorin Kuljasevic |
12 | 2523 Jacek Stopa |
13 | 2522 Eli Vovsha |
14 | 2519 John Donaldson |
15 | 2505 Pawel Blehm |
16 | 2495 Josh Friedel |
17 | 2494 Alex Stripunsky |
18 | 2491 Lev Milman |
19 | 2487 Georgi Orlov |
20 | 2487 Dean Ippolito |
21 | 2484 Pascal Charbonneau |
22 | 2481 Eugene Perelshteyn |
23 | 2477 Irina Krush |
24 | 2466 Jay Bonin |
25 | 2463 Vince McCambridge |
26 | 2460 Bryan Smith |
27 | 2454 Tegshsuren Enkhbat |
28 | 2453 Dmitry Schneider |
29 | 2449 Denis Shmelov |
30 | 2441 Eric Tangborn |
31 | 2440 Ron Burnett |
32 | 2433 Marcel Milat |
33 | 2432 Slava Mikhailuk |
34 | 2428 Sam Shankland |
35 | 2423 Oleg Zaikov |
36 | 2415 John Bartholomew |
37 | 2415 Robert Hess |
38 | 2411 Richard Costigan |
39 | 2407 Dmitry Zilberstein |
40 | 2406 Jonathan Schroer |
41 | 2405 Keaton Kiewra |
42 | 2402 Irina Zenyuk |
43 | 2399 William Kelleher |
44 | 2397 Blas Lugo |
45 | 2389 David Pruess |
46 | 2389 Francisco Guadalupe II |
47 | 2388 John Readey |
48 | 2387 Andrei Zaremba |
49 | 2386 Aviv Friedman |
50 | 2382 Mikhail Zlotnikov |
51 | 2381 Marcel Martinez |
52 | 2380 Todd Andrews |
53 | 2366 Parker Zhao |
54 | 2365 Elvin Wilson |
55 | 2361 Bruci Lopez |
56 | 2360 Chris Williams |
57 | 2358 Katerina Rohonyan |
58 | 2354 Larry Kaufman |
59 | 2354 Vadim Martirosov |
60 | 2353 Daniel Yeager |
61 | 2343 John Rouleau |
62 | 2334 Mackenzie Molner |
63 | 2333 Eric Rodriguez |
64 | 2327 Bayaraa Zorigt |
65 | 2322 Victor Shen |
66 | 2319 Miguel Espino |
67 | 2314 James Critelli |
68 | 2311 Marc Arnold |
69 | 2309 Michael Thaler |
70 | 2307 Peter Bierkens |
71 | 2304 Luis Barredo |
72 | 2303 Loren Schmidt |
73 | 2301 Evan Ju |
74 | 2301 Gregory Young |
75 | 2300 Matthew Herman |
76 | 2297 Alejandro Moreno Roman |
77 | 2295 Craig Jones |
78 | 2287 Michael Lee |
79 | 2279 John Timmel |
80 | 2276 Ralph Zimmer |
81 | 2265 Daniel Naroditsky |
82 | 2264 Udayan Bapat |
83 | 2263 Ilya Krasik |
84 | 2261 Tsagaan Battsetseg |
85 | 2258 Josh Sinanan |
86 | 2239 Matthew Bengtson |
87 | 2228 Peter Bereolos |
88 | 2211 Jerry Wheeler |
89 | 2209 Gerald Larson |
90 | 2183 James Wu |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)