USCL 2009 Power Rankings After Week 8
| 1 - | New Jersey | 1.000 |
| 2 - | Seattle | 0.984 |
| 3 - | Arizona | 0.870 |
| 4 - | San Francisco | 0.868 |
| 5 - | Boston | 0.868 |
| 6 - | New York | 0.821 |
| 7 - | Miami | 0.807 |
| 8 - | Dallas | 0.727 |
| 9 - | Philadelphia | 0.684 |
| 10 - | Baltimore | 0.684 |
| 11 - | Chicago | 0.673 |
| 12 - | Tennessee | 0.647 |
| 13 - | Queens | 0.635 |
| 14 - | Carolina | 0.597 |
Nakamura, unsurprisingly, remains on top. Gulko creeps up to second over Erenburg.
USCL 2009 Player Ratings After Week 8
| Rank | Rating | Name |
| 1 | 2647 | Hikaru Nakamura |
| 2 | 2615 | Boris Gulko |
| 3 | 2603 | Sergey Erenburg |
| 4 | 2595 | Gregory Serper |
| 5 | 2589 | Patrick Wolff |
| 6 | 2574 | Marko Zivanic |
| 7 | 2574 | Larry Christiansen |
| 8 | 2572 | Jaan Ehlvest |
| 9 | 2571 | Alejandro Ramirez |
| 10 | 2561 | Joel Benjamin |
| 11 | 2557 | Eugene Perelshteyn |
| 12 | 2554 | Julio Becerra |
| 13 | 2551 | Dean Ippolito |
| 14 | 2543 | Alex Lenderman |
| 15 | 2543 | Alex Stripunsky |
| 16 | 2537 | Jacek Stopa |
| 17 | 2535 | Josh Friedel |
| 18 | 2531 | Pascal Charbonneau |
| 19 | 2517 | Yuri Lapshun |
| 20 | 2513 | Giorgi Kacheishvili |
| 21 | 2510 | Daniel Ludwig |
| 22 | 2507 | Jan van de Mortel |
| 23 | 2507 | Eli Vovsha |
| 24 | 2502 | Rogelio Barcenilla |
| 25 | 2501 | Leonid Kritz |
| 26 | 2501 | Slava Mikhailuk |
| 27 | 2498 | Marc Esserman |
| 28 | 2492 | Bruci Lopez |
| 29 | 2490 | Levon Altounian |
| 30 | 2488 | Vinay Bhat |
| 31 | 2488 | John Fedorowicz |
| 32 | 2474 | Sam Shankland |
| 33 | 2463 | Dmitry Schneider |
| 34 | 2463 | John Bartholomew |
| 35 | 2461 | Blas Lugo |
| 36 | 2458 | Irina Krush |
| 37 | 2455 | John Donaldson |
| 38 | 2450 | Lev Milman |
| 39 | 2450 | Thomas Bartell |
| 40 | 2448 | Salvijus Bercys |
| 41 | 2446 | Angelo Young |
| 42 | 2445 | Alex Shabalov |
| 43 | 2444 | Bryan Smith |
| 44 | 2438 | Denis Shmelov |
| 45 | 2434 | David Pruess |
| 46 | 2434 | Jesse Kraai |
| 47 | 2433 | Jorge Sammour-Hasbun |
| 48 | 2433 | Larry Kaufman |
| 49 | 2430 | Marcel Martinez |
| 50 | 2426 | Mackenzie Molner |
| 51 | 2425 | Tegshsuren Enkhbat |
| 52 | 2423 | Jonathan Schroer |
| 53 | 2423 | Oleg Zaikov |
| 54 | 2421 | Sergey Kudrin |
| 55 | 2416 | Victor Shen |
| 56 | 2413 | Eric Rodriguez |
| 57 | 2412 | Gregory Braylovsky |
| 58 | 2408 | Mark Ginsburg |
| 59 | 2408 | Andrei Zaremba |
| 60 | 2391 | Jay Bonin |
| 61 | 2386 | Nikola Mitkov |
| 62 | 2384 | Shinsaku Uesugi |
| 63 | 2383 | Florin Felecan |
| 64 | 2380 | Keaton Kiewra |
| 65 | 2374 | Vadim Martirosov |
| 66 | 2374 | Mehmed Pasalic |
| 67 | 2374 | Yaacov Norowitz |
| 68 | 2370 | Robby Adamson |
| 69 | 2362 | Ron Burnett |
| 70 | 2360 | John Bick |
| 71 | 2358 | Marcel Milat |
| 72 | 2354 | Gregory Young |
| 73 | 2354 | Ralph Zimmer |
| 74 | 2349 | Aviv Friedman |
| 75 | 2348 | John Readey |
| 76 | 2346 | Danny Rensch |
| 77 | 2344 | David Adelberg |
| 78 | 2341 | Michael Lee |
| 79 | 2339 | Richard Costigan |
| 80 | 2336 | Daniel Naroditsky |
| 81 | 2335 | Yian Liou |
| 82 | 2329 | Ron Simpson |
| 83 | 2327 | Ilya Krasik |
| 84 | 2323 | Matthew Herman |
| 85 | 2323 | Peter Bereolos |
| 86 | 2320 | Evan Rosenberg |
| 87 | 2319 | Josh Sinanan |
| 88 | 2315 | Eric Tangborn |
| 89 | 2312 | Udayan Bapat |
| 90 | 2306 | Todd Andrews |
| 91 | 2306 | Anna Matlin |
| 92 | 2296 | Jon Burgess |
| 93 | 2294 | Ray Kaufman |
| 94 | 2288 | Craig Jones |
| 95 | 2285 | Bayaraa Zorigt |
| 96 | 2285 | Andrew Ng |
| 97 | 2283 | Eric Rosen |
| 98 | 2281 | Jennifer Shahade |
| 99 | 2272 | Katerina Rohonyan |
| 100 | 2260 | Andrew Wang |
| 101 | 2256 | Tsagaan Battsetseg |
| 102 | 2244 | Alejandro Moreno Roman |
| 103 | 2235 | Daniel Fernandez |
| 104 | 2232 | Kavinayan Sivakumar |
| 105 | 2222 | Gerald Larson |
| 106 | 2217 | Leo Martinez |
| 107 | 2217 | David Justice |
| 108 | 2213 | Trevor Magness |
| 109 | 2209 | Miguel Recio |
| 110 | 2209 | Nelson Lopez |
| 111 | 2207 | Elizabeth Vicary |
| 112 | 2196 | Ian Harris |
| 113 | 2189 | Jared Defibaugh |
| 114 | 2184 | Benjamin Katz |
| 115 | 2159 | Shaun Smith |
Posts
4 comments:
I beat a 2501 and drew a 2433 and languish at 2408?
Surely you are not carrying over the 2008 ratings? :)
At the end of 2008, you were 2370. Standard deviation was 75.
First, you beat Mikhailuk (2488) with Black. That's an effective rating difference of -190 (2370 - 2448 = 118 - 72 bonus for having Black). As a result, you went up to 2442.
Thenm, you drew Kaufman (2398) with White. That's an effective rating difference of +116 (2442 - 2398 = 44 + 72 penalty to having White). Also, since Arizona lost that match, the draw is counted as 0.33 insteas of the usual 0.50. As a result of all this, you went down to 2408.
Should you like to look at the spreadsheet, please let me know.
Did you invent the sadistic set of penalties all by your lonesome?
Arithmetic invented them.
After analyzing (statistically) all USCL games, it came out that White offered a 72 point rating advantage when it came to expected score.
Then, the 1/3 score if you draw when your team loses, and 2/3 score if you draw when your team wins, came from the logic of team play, when match points are all that matters.
The rating system is based on Glicko. And, I passed the variations by Mark Glickman, chair of the USCF Ratings Committee.
Post a Comment