Last week. Last place in the prediction contest. Before next year, I'll recalibrate the model.
Unless I somehow miraculously win.
CAROLINA vs PHILADELPHIA
The march of the Shahades. Hopefully Jen won't be jetlagged from China.
Prediction: Carolina 2.0 - 2.0 Philadelphia
BOSTON vs QUEENS
Lenderman has a chance to cap off his perfect season, but the high (USCL) rated Esserman stands in his way. Something has to give.
Prediction: Boston 2.5 - 1.5 Queens
NEW YORK vs NEW JERSEY
An almost exact reprise of last year's situation. If New Jersey wins or draws, they are in the playoffs, else New York is. Again, my model betrays the Knockouts. Stupid model.
Prediction: New York 2.5 - 1.5 New Jersey
TENNESSEE vs BALTIMORE
The battle for the cellar. Two teams, nothing to lose. No playoffs this year for either team. Perhaps we'll see the Orangutan or the Latvian Gambit, rather than something pedestrian like a Slav or a Ruy Lopez.
Prediction: Tennessee 1.5 - 2.5 Baltimore
MIAMI vs SAN FRANCISCO
San Francisco tosses out a solid lineup, but without their usual underrated minors. Like the Sharks they are, Miami will smell blood.
Prediction: Miami 2.5 - 1.5 San Francisco
DALLAS vs CHICAGO
Chicago is down a few players this week. Fortunately, that means a big win for Dallas.
Prediction: Dallas 3.0 - 1.0 Chicago
ARIZONA vs SEATTLE
A real toss up here. The West Coast is a confusing place.
Prediction: Arizona 1.5 - 2.5 Seattle
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Thursday, October 23, 2008
USCL Power Rankings Week 9
Queens is back on top! After San Francisco's loss to Dallas, the Pioneers recapture the top spot, and the Mechanics drop to three. Miami's big win hops them to the number two position. Boston is the biggest upward mover, to the seventh position.
Next week will be the last week for the power rankings!
1 - | Queens (+1) |
2 - | Miami (+1) |
3 - | San Francisco (-2) |
4 - | Carolina (0) |
5 - | Dallas (+1) |
6 - | New Jersey (-1) |
7 - | Boston (+2) |
8 - | Seattle (-1) |
9 - | Chicago (-1) |
10 - | Arizona (0) |
11 - | New York (0) |
12 - | Tennessee (0) |
13 - | Philadelphia (0) |
14 - | Baltimore (0) |
Next week will be the last week for the power rankings!
Labels:
2008,
power rankings,
united states chess league
USCL Top Board Honors Week 9
This post describes the details on how these are calculated.
One week to go in the regular season, and it a race to the medal podium.
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (13.70)
Silver - Jaan Ehlvest (11.24)
Bronze - Alex Stripunsky (10.22)
Board 2
Gold - Alex Lenderman (19.68)
Silver - Oleg Zaikov (8.95)
Bronze - Josh Friedel (8.34)
Board 3
Gold - Marc Esserman (14.80)
Silver - Sam Shankland (13.75)
Bronze - Ron Simpson (10.55)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Angelo Young (8.83)
Bronze - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
One week to go in the regular season, and it a race to the medal podium.
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (13.70)
Silver - Jaan Ehlvest (11.24)
Bronze - Alex Stripunsky (10.22)
Board 2
Gold - Alex Lenderman (19.68)
Silver - Oleg Zaikov (8.95)
Bronze - Josh Friedel (8.34)
Board 3
Gold - Marc Esserman (14.80)
Silver - Sam Shankland (13.75)
Bronze - Ron Simpson (10.55)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Angelo Young (8.83)
Bronze - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
Labels:
2008,
top board honors,
united states chess league
USCL Week 9 Rating List
2008 United States Chess League
Rating List after Week 9
Next week is the final week of the regular season!
Rating List after Week 9
1 | 2643 | Jaan Ehlvest |
2 | 2631 | Julio Becerra |
3 | 2606 | Hikaru Nakamura |
4 | 2600 | Sergey Erenburg |
5 | 2596 | Josh Friedel |
6 | 2593 | Pascal Charbonneau |
7 | 2593 | Davorin Kuljasevic |
8 | 2584 | Marko Zivanic |
9 | 2583 | Marc Esserman |
10 | 2564 | Larry Christiansen |
11 | 2562 | Vinay Bhat |
12 | 2557 | Patrick Wolff |
13 | 2548 | Joel Benjamin |
14 | 2543 | Alex Stripunsky |
15 | 2539 | Eli Vovsha |
16 | 2537 | Levon Altounian |
17 | 2536 | Pawel Blehm |
18 | 2525 | Rogelio Barcenilla |
19 | 2524 | Alex Lenderman |
20 | 2523 | Lev Milman |
21 | 2522 | Sergey Kudrin |
22 | 2520 | Jorge Sammour-Hasbun |
23 | 2519 | Boris Gulko |
24 | 2517 | Bruci Lopez |
25 | 2517 | Dmitry Schneider |
26 | 2515 | Dean Ippolito |
27 | 2501 | Gregory Serper |
28 | 2497 | Emory Tate |
29 | 2486 | Slava Mikhailuk |
30 | 2483 | Drasko Boskovic |
31 | 2482 | Thomas Bartell |
32 | 2482 | John Fedorowicz |
33 | 2477 | Eugene Perelshteyn |
34 | 2474 | Sam Shankland |
35 | 2463 | Irina Krush |
36 | 2463 | Gregory Braylovsky |
37 | 2456 | Marcel Milat |
38 | 2454 | Parker Zhao |
39 | 2453 | Jan van de Mortel |
40 | 2448 | David Vigorito |
41 | 2448 | John Donaldson |
42 | 2444 | Osmany Perea |
43 | 2440 | Florin Felecan |
44 | 2435 | John Bartholomew |
45 | 2433 | Oleg Zaikov |
46 | 2433 | Jonathan Schroer |
47 | 2432 | Mehmed Pasalic |
48 | 2427 | Ron Simpson |
49 | 2422 | Nikola Mitkov |
50 | 2420 | Marcel Martinez |
51 | 2415 | Mackenzie Molner |
52 | 2413 | Denis Shmelov |
53 | 2411 | Igor Schneider |
54 | 2405 | Ron Burnett |
55 | 2402 | Charles Galofre |
56 | 2399 | Charles Riordan |
57 | 2396 | Bryan Smith |
58 | 2394 | Jay Bonin |
59 | 2389 | Tegshsuren Enkhbat |
60 | 2388 | David Pruess |
61 | 2385 | Blas Lugo |
62 | 2372 | Mark Ginsburg |
63 | 2372 | Eric Rodriguez |
64 | 2367 | Eric Tangborn |
65 | 2365 | Angelo Young |
66 | 2363 | Daniel Yeager |
67 | 2359 | Peter Bereolos |
68 | 2354 | Todd Andrews |
69 | 2350 | Daniel Naroditsky |
70 | 2350 | Katerina Rohonyan |
71 | 2347 | Robby Adamson |
72 | 2347 | Richard Costigan |
73 | 2338 | Udayan Bapat |
74 | 2338 | Gregory Young |
75 | 2338 | Irina Zenyuk |
76 | 2328 | Bayaraa Zorigt |
77 | 2319 | Michael Thaler |
78 | 2318 | Matthew Herman |
79 | 2317 | Larry Kaufman |
80 | 2312 | John Readey |
81 | 2309 | Danny Rensch |
82 | 2302 | Craig Jones |
83 | 2299 | Elvin Wilson |
84 | 2298 | Ilan Meerovich |
85 | 2295 | Michael Lee |
86 | 2294 | Ralph Zimmer |
87 | 2285 | Victor Shen |
88 | 2279 | Andy May |
89 | 2277 | Ilya Krasik |
90 | 2269 | Warren Harper |
91 | 2268 | Matan Prilleltens |
92 | 2266 | Aaron Khan |
93 | 2262 | John Bick |
94 | 2258 | Evan Ju |
95 | 2251 | Ray Kaufman |
96 | 2245 | Evan Rosenberg |
97 | 2245 | Benjamin Katz |
98 | 2244 | Matthew Bengtson |
99 | 2243 | Leo Martinez |
100 | 2237 | Jayson Lian |
101 | 2225 | Josh Sinanan |
102 | 2205 | Jennifer Shahade |
103 | 2199 | Jerry Wheeler |
104 | 2192 | Karina Vazirova |
Next week is the final week of the regular season!
Sunday, October 19, 2008
USCL Week 9 Predictions
Last week's prediction results were great for everyone! Which is too bad for me, as the Lime still is in a distant third place.
QUEENS vs CAROLINA
Unless Queens had a problem fielding a stronger lineup, it is unclear what they are doing. With no Lenderman, and a huge gap between second and third boards, perhaps they think they can pull off a 2-2 tie. No dice. Carolina wins big, and will pull into first place on tie breaks.
Prediction: Queens 1.0 - 3.0 Carolina
NEW YORK vs BALTIMORE
Knights continue to run for the playoffs.
Prediction: New York 2.5 - 1.5 Baltimore
PHILADELPHIA vs BOSTON
Boston continues their run for the playoffs too.
Prediction: Philadelphia 1.0 - 3.0 Boston
NEW JERSEY vs MIAMI
New Jersey clinches this week.
Prediction: New Jersey 2.0 - 2.0 Miami
DALLAS vs SAN FRANCISCO
Super young master 10 year old Nicholas Nip debuts this week. Aren't these games past his bedtime?
Prediction: Dallas 1.5 - 2.5 San Francisco
SEATTLE vs TENNESSEE
No Nakamura. Yes Ehlvest. Doesn't matter.
Prediction: Seattle 2.5 - 1.5 Tennessee
CHICAGO vs ARIZONA
Expansion battle, round 2. Blaze burns Scorps.
Prediction: Chicago 3.0 - 1.0 Arizona
QUEENS vs CAROLINA
Unless Queens had a problem fielding a stronger lineup, it is unclear what they are doing. With no Lenderman, and a huge gap between second and third boards, perhaps they think they can pull off a 2-2 tie. No dice. Carolina wins big, and will pull into first place on tie breaks.
Prediction: Queens 1.0 - 3.0 Carolina
NEW YORK vs BALTIMORE
Knights continue to run for the playoffs.
Prediction: New York 2.5 - 1.5 Baltimore
PHILADELPHIA vs BOSTON
Boston continues their run for the playoffs too.
Prediction: Philadelphia 1.0 - 3.0 Boston
NEW JERSEY vs MIAMI
New Jersey clinches this week.
Prediction: New Jersey 2.0 - 2.0 Miami
DALLAS vs SAN FRANCISCO
Super young master 10 year old Nicholas Nip debuts this week. Aren't these games past his bedtime?
Prediction: Dallas 1.5 - 2.5 San Francisco
SEATTLE vs TENNESSEE
No Nakamura. Yes Ehlvest. Doesn't matter.
Prediction: Seattle 2.5 - 1.5 Tennessee
CHICAGO vs ARIZONA
Expansion battle, round 2. Blaze burns Scorps.
Prediction: Chicago 3.0 - 1.0 Arizona
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
USCL 2008 Power Rankings Week 8
A lot of small movements this week in the BLUPRs (Bionic Lime USCL Power Rankings). Carolina moves up a couple spots to fourth place. New York vaults from the cellar up three spots to 11th. New Jersey and Philadelphia both drop a couple of spots. And... the new cellar dweller is the 2005 USCL champions Baltimore. How the might have fallen, despite the stellar play of their first board, GM Sergey Erenburg.
1 - | San Francisco (0) |
2 - | Queens (0) |
3 - | Miami (+1) |
4 - | Carolina (+2) |
5 - | New Jersey (-2) |
6 - | Dallas (-1) |
7 - | Seattle (+1) |
8 - | Chicago(-1) |
9 - | Boston (0) |
10 - | Arizona (0) |
11 - | New York (+3) |
12 - | Tennessee (0) |
13 - | Philadelphia (-2) |
14 - | Baltimore (-1) |
USCL Top Board Honors Week 8
This post describes the details on how these are calculated. Lenderman has now played more on Board 2, so that's the Board he is eligible for this week.
So, with two weeks to go, here are the Top Board Honors as of week 8.
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (10.94)
Silver - Sergey Erenburg (10.85)
Bronze - Jaan Ehlvest (10.02)
Board 2
Gold - Alex Lenderman (19.68)
Silver - Oleg Zaikov (10.03)
Bronze - Josh Friedel (8.47)
Board 3
Gold - Sam Shankland (13.75)
Silver - Marc Esserman (12.03)
Bronze - Osmany Perea (9.38)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Angelo Young (8.83)
Bronze - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
So, with two weeks to go, here are the Top Board Honors as of week 8.
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (10.94)
Silver - Sergey Erenburg (10.85)
Bronze - Jaan Ehlvest (10.02)
Board 2
Gold - Alex Lenderman (19.68)
Silver - Oleg Zaikov (10.03)
Bronze - Josh Friedel (8.47)
Board 3
Gold - Sam Shankland (13.75)
Silver - Marc Esserman (12.03)
Bronze - Osmany Perea (9.38)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Angelo Young (8.83)
Bronze - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
USCL Rating List, Week 8
Sergey Erenburg, with a win, climbs up the rating list again, but Jaan Ehlvest shoots even higher. Only two weeks to go... Who will top the list this year?
1 | 2648 | Jaan Ehlvest |
2 | 2614 | Sergey Erenburg |
3 | 2613 | Julio Becerra |
4 | 2606 | Hikaru Nakamura |
5 | 2593 | Josh Friedel |
6 | 2588 | Marko Zivanic |
7 | 2581 | Vinay Bhat |
8 | 2578 | Pascal Charbonneau |
9 | 2575 | Marc Esserman |
10 | 2571 | Davorin Kuljasevic |
11 | 2563 | Joel Benjamin |
12 | 2557 | Patrick Wolff |
13 | 2547 | Larry Christiansen |
14 | 2537 | Levon Altounian |
15 | 2536 | Pawel Blehm |
16 | 2535 | Alex Stripunsky |
17 | 2532 | Sergey Kudrin |
18 | 2530 | Lev Milman |
19 | 2528 | Dean Ippolito |
20 | 2524 | Alex Lenderman |
21 | 2520 | Jorge Sammour-Hasbun |
22 | 2520 | Eli Vovsha |
23 | 2519 | Boris Gulko |
24 | 2517 | Dmitry Schneider |
25 | 2506 | Jan van de Mortel |
26 | 2497 | Gregory Serper |
27 | 2496 | Emory Tate |
28 | 2494 | Rogelio Barcenilla |
29 | 2494 | Bruci Lopez |
30 | 2483 | Drasko Boskovic |
31 | 2483 | Eugene Perelshteyn |
32 | 2482 | John Fedorowicz |
33 | 2478 | Thomas Bartell |
34 | 2474 | Sam Shankland |
35 | 2468 | Osmany Perea |
36 | 2460 | Gregory Braylovsky |
37 | 2456 | Marcel Milat |
38 | 2456 | Slava Mikhailuk |
39 | 2455 | Nikola Mitkov |
40 | 2454 | Parker Zhao |
41 | 2452 | Irina Krush |
42 | 2448 | David Vigorito |
43 | 2448 | John Donaldson |
44 | 2448 | Oleg Zaikov |
45 | 2440 | Florin Felecan |
46 | 2435 | John Bartholomew |
47 | 2433 | Jonathan Schroer |
48 | 2432 | Mehmed Pasalic |
49 | 2428 | Ron Burnett |
50 | 2420 | Marcel Martinez |
51 | 2416 | Ron Simpson |
52 | 2413 | Denis Shmelov |
53 | 2403 | David Pruess |
54 | 2402 | Charles Galofre |
55 | 2401 | Igor Schneider |
56 | 2399 | Charles Riordan |
57 | 2397 | Mackenzie Molner |
58 | 2396 | Bryan Smith |
59 | 2396 | Tegshsuren Enkhbat |
60 | 2394 | Jay Bonin |
61 | 2385 | Blas Lugo |
62 | 2372 | Eric Rodriguez |
63 | 2367 | Eric Tangborn |
64 | 2365 | Angelo Young |
65 | 2363 | Daniel Yeager |
66 | 2359 | Peter Bereolos |
67 | 2350 | Daniel Naroditsky |
68 | 2350 | Katerina Rohonyan |
69 | 2349 | Richard Costigan |
70 | 2347 | Robby Adamson |
71 | 2341 | Mark Ginsburg |
72 | 2340 | Todd Andrews |
73 | 2338 | Udayan Bapat |
74 | 2338 | Gregory Young |
75 | 2338 | Irina Zenyuk |
76 | 2336 | John Readey |
77 | 2322 | Bayaraa Zorigt |
78 | 2319 | Michael Thaler |
79 | 2317 | Larry Kaufman |
80 | 2311 | Danny Rensch |
81 | 2302 | Matthew Herman |
82 | 2299 | Elvin Wilson |
83 | 2297 | Craig Jones |
84 | 2295 | Michael Lee |
85 | 2295 | Ralph Zimmer |
86 | 2288 | Aaron Khan |
87 | 2285 | Victor Shen |
88 | 2279 | Andy May |
89 | 2271 | Ilya Krasik |
90 | 2269 | Warren Harper |
91 | 2260 | Jayson Lian |
92 | 2260 | Matthew Bengtson |
93 | 2258 | Evan Ju |
94 | 2257 | Benjamin Katz |
95 | 2251 | Ray Kaufman |
96 | 2249 | Josh Sinanan |
97 | 2245 | Evan Rosenberg |
98 | 2243 | Leo Martinez |
99 | 2233 | John Bick |
100 | 2205 | Jennifer Shahade |
101 | 2199 | Jerry Wheeler |
102 | 2192 | Karina Vazirova |
Sunday, October 12, 2008
USCL Week 8 Predictions (ver. 2)
PHILADELPHIA vs NEW YORK
Should be a close match on every board, but the Knights ought to be able to pull out a squeaker.
Prediction: Philadelphia 1.5 - 2.5 New York
NEW JERSEY vs CAROLINA
Stupid model makes an idiotic prediction. Why did I promise to listen to the model no matter what? I'm an idiot and a traitor.
Prediction: New Jersey 1.5 - 2.5 Carolina
MIAMI vs DALLAS
On one board, the model calculates the difference in adjusted rating to be 79 points (which is a draw), and on another board, the model calculates the difference in adjusted rating to be 80 points (which is a win). Too close to call, but the model calls it anyway.
Prediction: Miami 1.5 - 2.5 Dallas
BALTIMORE vs BOSTON
Despite Erenburg's mighty play, Baltimore hasn't really had a run of great results this season. Unfortunately for them, the trend continues.
Prediction: Baltimore 1.5 - 2.5 Boston
CHICAGO vs QUEENS
What a psychological ploy by Chicago this week! Early on, they announced that the infamous Tate would be playing board 2. So, it forced Queens to make a decision -- should they play Lenderman on board 2 or board 3? Queens opted for a Lenderman - Tate showdown.
Prediction: Chicago 2.5 - 1.5 Queens
SAN FRANCISCO vs TENNESSEE
San Francisco throws up an A-line up, and Tennessee counters with Ehlvest on top board. San Francisco will pull away from the rest of the field this week.
Prediction: San Francisco 3.0 - 1.0 Tennessee
SEATTLE vs ARIZONA
Despite what Nakamura says, Seattle does get respect. Especially when he's playing board 1. The Sluggers will prevail with a big win.
Prediction: Seattle 3.0 - 1.0 Arizona
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Week 7 USCL Top Board Honors
Last week's post had all the details on how this is calculated. So, let's get right to the honors, shall we?
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (8.32)
Silver - Sergey Erenburg (8.29)
Bronze - Lev Milman (7.64)
Board 2
Gold - Josh Friedel (8.47)
Silver - Thomas Bartell (8.39)
Bronze - Boris Gulko (8.29)
Board 3
Gold - Alex Lenderman (16.84)
Silver - Sam Shankland (11.37)
Bronze - Marc Esserman (9.38)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
Bronze - Bayaraa Zorigt (6.22)
Board 1
Gold - Julio Becerra (8.32)
Silver - Sergey Erenburg (8.29)
Bronze - Lev Milman (7.64)
Board 2
Gold - Josh Friedel (8.47)
Silver - Thomas Bartell (8.39)
Bronze - Boris Gulko (8.29)
Board 3
Gold - Alex Lenderman (16.84)
Silver - Sam Shankland (11.37)
Bronze - Marc Esserman (9.38)
Board 4
Gold - Eric Rodriguez (11.20)
Silver - Daniel Naroditsky (8.63)
Bronze - Bayaraa Zorigt (6.22)
Friday, October 10, 2008
USCL 2008 Power Rankings, Week 7
Regicide rules the power rankings this week, as the Queens Pioneers fall out of first. Solid San Francisco takes up the top spot. Carolina graciously validated their high ranking by winning big this week too, although Miami vaulted above them and Dallas with their big win.
The bottom of the table remained pretty much the same, except Tennessee is creeping up.
Number in parentheses following the name is the change from last week.
The bottom of the table remained pretty much the same, except Tennessee is creeping up.
1 - | San Francisco (+1) |
2 - | Queens (-1) |
3 - | New Jersey (0) |
4 - | Miami (+2) |
5 - | Dallas (-1) |
6 - | Carolina (-1) |
7 - | Chicago (0) |
8 - | Seattle (0) |
9 - | Boston (0) |
10 - | Arizona (0) |
11 - | Philadelphia (0) |
12 - | Tennessee (+1) |
13 - | Baltimore (-1) |
14 - | NewYork (0) |
Number in parentheses following the name is the change from last week.
Labels:
2008,
power rankings,
united states chess league
Thursday, October 09, 2008
2008 USCL Rating List, Week 7
After Nakamura's loss to Bhat, Erenburg takes over the top spot, and Becerra's win moves him up to second. Zivanic climbs the ranks too.
1 | 2611 | Sergey Erenburg |
2 | 2607 | Julio Becerra |
3 | 2606 | Jaan Ehlvest |
4 | 2602 | Marko Zivanic |
5 | 2602 | Hikaru Nakamura |
6 | 2595 | Patrick Wolff |
7 | 2593 | Josh Friedel |
8 | 2578 | Vinay Bhat |
9 | 2573 | Marc Esserman |
10 | 2571 | Davorin Kuljasevic |
11 | 2561 | Pascal Charbonneau |
12 | 2558 | Joel Benjamin |
13 | 2547 | Levon Altounian |
14 | 2547 | Larry Christiansen |
15 | 2542 | Sergey Kudrin |
16 | 2538 | Drasko Boskovic |
17 | 2537 | Lev Milman |
18 | 2536 | Pawel Blehm |
19 | 2528 | Dean Ippolito |
20 | 2525 | Jorge Sammour-Hasbun |
21 | 2520 | Eli Vovsha |
22 | 2519 | Boris Gulko |
23 | 2517 | Dmitry Schneider |
24 | 2515 | Alex Lenderman |
25 | 2512 | Emory Tate |
26 | 2509 | Alex Stripunsky |
27 | 2506 | Jan van de Mortel |
28 | 2497 | Thomas Bartell |
29 | 2497 | Gregory Serper |
30 | 2494 | Rogelio Barcenilla |
31 | 2483 | Eugene Perelshteyn |
32 | 2474 | Sam Shankland |
33 | 2466 | John Fedorowicz |
34 | 2460 | Mehmed Pasalic |
35 | 2460 | Gregory Braylovsky |
36 | 2456 | Marcel Milat |
37 | 2455 | Nikola Mitkov |
38 | 2455 | Osmany Perea |
39 | 2452 | Irina Krush |
40 | 2448 | David Vigorito |
41 | 2448 | John Donaldson |
42 | 2443 | Oleg Zaikov |
43 | 2443 | John Bartholomew |
44 | 2433 | Jonathan Schroer |
45 | 2430 | Slava Mikhailuk |
46 | 2428 | Ron Burnett |
47 | 2427 | Parker Zhao |
48 | 2425 | Bruci Lopez |
49 | 2420 | Marcel Martinez |
50 | 2410 | Denis Shmelov |
51 | 2403 | David Pruess |
52 | 2403 | Mackenzie Molner |
53 | 2402 | Charles Galofre |
54 | 2401 | Igor Schneider |
55 | 2399 | Charles Riordan |
56 | 2399 | Ron Simpson |
57 | 2396 | Bryan Smith |
58 | 2396 | Tegshsuren Enkhbat |
59 | 2385 | Blas Lugo |
60 | 2379 | Jay Bonin |
61 | 2372 | Eric Rodriguez |
62 | 2372 | Angelo Young |
63 | 2367 | Eric Tangborn |
64 | 2364 | Richard Costigan |
65 | 2364 | Mark Ginsburg |
66 | 2363 | Daniel Yeager |
67 | 2359 | Peter Bereolos |
68 | 2350 | Daniel Naroditsky |
69 | 2342 | Todd Andrews |
70 | 2342 | Robby Adamson |
71 | 2338 | Udayan Bapat |
72 | 2338 | Irina Zenyuk |
73 | 2336 | John Readey |
74 | 2322 | Bayaraa Zorigt |
75 | 2322 | Larry Kaufman |
76 | 2321 | Michael Lee |
77 | 2313 | Ralph Zimmer |
78 | 2311 | Michael Thaler |
79 | 2311 | Danny Rensch |
80 | 2305 | Craig Jones |
81 | 2299 | Elvin Wilson |
82 | 2292 | Matthew Herman |
83 | 2288 | Aaron Khan |
84 | 2279 | Andy May |
85 | 2277 | Matthew Bengtson |
86 | 2277 | Victor Shen |
87 | 2276 | Evan Ju |
88 | 2260 | Jayson Lian |
89 | 2257 | Benjamin Katz |
90 | 2256 | Ilya Krasik |
91 | 2252 | Ray Kaufman |
92 | 2249 | Josh Sinanan |
93 | 2245 | Evan Rosenberg |
94 | 2243 | Leo Martinez |
95 | 2234 | John Bick |
96 | 2232 | Warren Harper |
97 | 2205 | Jennifer Shahade |
98 | 2199 | Jerry Wheeler |
Saturday, October 04, 2008
USCL Week 7 Predictions
Last week bad! This week good!
There are two big matchups this week -- one based on rivalry and the other based on actual plaoyff position. The heated rivalry between Boston and New York, with its trash talking and accusations, starts things off at 7:00pm on Monday. Following right behind at 7:15pm is the battle for first place in the Eastern division between New Jersey and Queens.
BOSTON vs NEW YORK (Monday)
It sure would have been fun to see Larry play the Fed, but alas, it was not to be. Still, these teams absolutely despise each other. Good fun.
Prediction: Boston 2.5 - 1.5 New York
QUEENS vs NEW JERSEY (Monday)
Queens is the big man on campus, assuming that's the correct gender to use when referring to queens. New Jersey is the feisty brother-in-law that crashes the BMoC's catered pool party. The stuffed mushrooms are going to end up all over the clean towels.
Prediction: Queens 1.5 - 2.5 New Jersey
TENNESSEE vs CHICAGO (Monday)
Is Tennessee in the central time zone? Not that it makes any difference, I was just curious. The Blaze ought to redeem the Cubs and White Sox ignominious starts in the MLB playoffs.
Prediction: Tennessee 1.0 - 3.0 Chicago
SAN FRANCISCO vs SEATTLE (Monday)
Mechanics versus Sluggers. Fog versus Rain. Brownies versus Coffee. Liberal activists versus liberal activists. All the same.
Prediction: San Francisco 2.0 - 2.0 Seattle
BALTIMORE vs CAROLINA
Even with the mighty Erenburg, the Kingfishers will fall to the Cobras. On paper, though, this should go totally the other way. My model eats paper for lunch.
Prediction: Baltimore 1.5 - 2.5 Carolina
DALLAS vs PHILADELPHIA
The Destiny versus the Inventors. Sounds like a battle between Calvinists and free-will advocates. That ought to be bloody, and indeed, the model expects all decisive games here.
Prediction: Dallas 2.0 - 2.0 Philadelphia
ARIZONA vs MIAMI
Sharks are big! Scorpions are small! Both are frightening! Big beats small.
Prediction: Arizona 1.5 - 2.5 Miami
There are two big matchups this week -- one based on rivalry and the other based on actual plaoyff position. The heated rivalry between Boston and New York, with its trash talking and accusations, starts things off at 7:00pm on Monday. Following right behind at 7:15pm is the battle for first place in the Eastern division between New Jersey and Queens.
BOSTON vs NEW YORK (Monday)
It sure would have been fun to see Larry play the Fed, but alas, it was not to be. Still, these teams absolutely despise each other. Good fun.
Prediction: Boston 2.5 - 1.5 New York
QUEENS vs NEW JERSEY (Monday)
Queens is the big man on campus, assuming that's the correct gender to use when referring to queens. New Jersey is the feisty brother-in-law that crashes the BMoC's catered pool party. The stuffed mushrooms are going to end up all over the clean towels.
Prediction: Queens 1.5 - 2.5 New Jersey
TENNESSEE vs CHICAGO (Monday)
Is Tennessee in the central time zone? Not that it makes any difference, I was just curious. The Blaze ought to redeem the Cubs and White Sox ignominious starts in the MLB playoffs.
Prediction: Tennessee 1.0 - 3.0 Chicago
SAN FRANCISCO vs SEATTLE (Monday)
Mechanics versus Sluggers. Fog versus Rain. Brownies versus Coffee. Liberal activists versus liberal activists. All the same.
Prediction: San Francisco 2.0 - 2.0 Seattle
BALTIMORE vs CAROLINA
Even with the mighty Erenburg, the Kingfishers will fall to the Cobras. On paper, though, this should go totally the other way. My model eats paper for lunch.
Prediction: Baltimore 1.5 - 2.5 Carolina
DALLAS vs PHILADELPHIA
The Destiny versus the Inventors. Sounds like a battle between Calvinists and free-will advocates. That ought to be bloody, and indeed, the model expects all decisive games here.
Prediction: Dallas 2.0 - 2.0 Philadelphia
ARIZONA vs MIAMI
Sharks are big! Scorpions are small! Both are frightening! Big beats small.
Prediction: Arizona 1.5 - 2.5 Miami
Friday, October 03, 2008
Week 6 New System Top Board Honors
After all the spirited commentary over the way that I did the Top Board Honors, it got me thinking about how I calculated Top Board Honors.
The way I did it before was okay, but there are a lot better ways of doing it. This is one of them.
The real way this should be done is based on performance rating, not just absolute rating. However, if you just base it on performance rating, then only one win over a 2400, and you've got a 2800 performance rating, which should win. So, therefore, you might as well have some minimum number of games played -- but that seems so artificial.
Therefore, I've developed a points system for determining top board honors that rewards (1) performance rating, (2) games played, and (3) score. It also differentiates performance ratings based on color, and whether your team won, drew, or lost the match.
Performance Ratings
Performance Ratings take into account the result of the games, whether the player's team won, drew, or lost and the color that the player had. (Performance Ratings are based on my USCL rating system.)
In regard to match and individual results, (as with the USCL rating system) if a player's game was drawn and the player's team won, the player is given 2/3 of a point. If a player's game was drawn and the player's team lost, the player is given 1/3 of a point. If a player drew and the match was drawn, the player is given 1/2 point. Wins and losses are counted as one and zero, regardless of the match outcome.
Performance ratings take into account color played as well. A win with white will give a player a performance rating of the opponents rating plus 328, while a win with black will give a player a performance rating of the opponents rating plus 472. Other outcomes are scaled similarly. This takes into account the empirical fact that having the White pieces is worth approximately 72 rating points.
Performance Rating for each game is calculated by adding the opponent's rating and the number specified.
If player had White:
Win +328
Draw (Team Won) +64
Draw (Match Drawn) -72
Draw (Team Lost) -208
Loss -472
If player had Black:
Win +472
Draw (Team Won) +208
Draw (Match Drawn) +72
Draw (Team Lost) -64
Loss -328
The Formula
Here is the actual formula to calculate the Top Board Honors Points.
TBH: Top Board Honors points
p(i): Performance Rating against opponent i
n: Number of opponents played
s(i): Score against opponent i
TBH = 0.0001 * ( SUM[i: 1..n; p(i)] * ( ( SUM[i: 1..n; s(i)] + 1) / (n + 1) ) ^2 )
Note that I added 1 to the numerator and denominator of the second term so that when you square the number it will not decrease.
Example...
Player plays in three matches.
TBH = 0.0001 * ( (7414) * ( 3.17 / 4 ) ^2 )
TBH = 0.0001 * ( 7414 * 0.6281)
TBH = 0.0001 * 4656
TBH = 4.66
Basically, if you get a high performance rating, and play in a lot of games that you score well in, you'll have a lot of Top Board Honors points. Seems reasonable enough. It is multiplied by 1/1000 because it makes the points small enough to type.
Which Board?
Players get consideration for the board they have played the most games on. If they have played the most number of games on two or more boards, the board on which they played most recently (of those boards) will be the one for which they are eligible.
The Top Board Honors after Week 6
So, with all that, here are the Top Board Honors after week 6, with the number of TBH points they have in parentheses.
Board 1
Gold: Hikaru Nakamura (8.74), Seattle
Silver: Sergey Erenburg (8.58), Baltimore
Bronze: Jaan Ehlvest (7.09), Tennessee
Board 2
Gold: Alex Lenderman (13.96), Queens
Silver: Dean Ippolito (9.66), New Jersey
Bronze: Josh Friedel (8.47), San Francisco
Board 3
Gold: Angelo Young (9.13), Chicago
Silver: Sam Shankland (8.99), San Francisco
Bronze: Mackenzie Molner (7.18), New Jersey
Board 4
Gold: Eric Rodriguez (8.80), Miami
Silver: Marc Esserman (6.77), Boston
Bronze: Daniel Naroditsky (6.38), San Francisco
The way I did it before was okay, but there are a lot better ways of doing it. This is one of them.
The real way this should be done is based on performance rating, not just absolute rating. However, if you just base it on performance rating, then only one win over a 2400, and you've got a 2800 performance rating, which should win. So, therefore, you might as well have some minimum number of games played -- but that seems so artificial.
Therefore, I've developed a points system for determining top board honors that rewards (1) performance rating, (2) games played, and (3) score. It also differentiates performance ratings based on color, and whether your team won, drew, or lost the match.
Performance Ratings
Performance Ratings take into account the result of the games, whether the player's team won, drew, or lost and the color that the player had. (Performance Ratings are based on my USCL rating system.)
In regard to match and individual results, (as with the USCL rating system) if a player's game was drawn and the player's team won, the player is given 2/3 of a point. If a player's game was drawn and the player's team lost, the player is given 1/3 of a point. If a player drew and the match was drawn, the player is given 1/2 point. Wins and losses are counted as one and zero, regardless of the match outcome.
Performance ratings take into account color played as well. A win with white will give a player a performance rating of the opponents rating plus 328, while a win with black will give a player a performance rating of the opponents rating plus 472. Other outcomes are scaled similarly. This takes into account the empirical fact that having the White pieces is worth approximately 72 rating points.
Performance Rating for each game is calculated by adding the opponent's rating and the number specified.
If player had White:
Win +328
Draw (Team Won) +64
Draw (Match Drawn) -72
Draw (Team Lost) -208
Loss -472
If player had Black:
Win +472
Draw (Team Won) +208
Draw (Match Drawn) +72
Draw (Team Lost) -64
Loss -328
The Formula
Here is the actual formula to calculate the Top Board Honors Points.
TBH: Top Board Honors points
p(i): Performance Rating against opponent i
n: Number of opponents played
s(i): Score against opponent i
TBH = 0.0001 * ( SUM[i: 1..n; p(i)] * ( ( SUM[i: 1..n; s(i)] + 1) / (n + 1) ) ^2 )
Note that I added 1 to the numerator and denominator of the second term so that when you square the number it will not decrease.
Example...
Player plays in three matches.
- Match 1 - Team match is drawn. Player has White and draws opponent rated 2300 (worth 1/2 point). Performance rating is 2300-72 or 2228.
- Match 2 - Players team wins. Player has Black and draws opponent rated 2400 (worth 2/3 point, since team won). Performance rating is 2400+208 or 2608.
- Match 3 - Players team loses. Player has White and wins against opponent rating 2250 (worth 1 point). Performance rating is 2250+328 or 2578.
TBH = 0.0001 * ( (7414) * ( 3.17 / 4 ) ^2 )
TBH = 0.0001 * ( 7414 * 0.6281)
TBH = 0.0001 * 4656
TBH = 4.66
Basically, if you get a high performance rating, and play in a lot of games that you score well in, you'll have a lot of Top Board Honors points. Seems reasonable enough. It is multiplied by 1/1000 because it makes the points small enough to type.
Which Board?
Players get consideration for the board they have played the most games on. If they have played the most number of games on two or more boards, the board on which they played most recently (of those boards) will be the one for which they are eligible.
The Top Board Honors after Week 6
So, with all that, here are the Top Board Honors after week 6, with the number of TBH points they have in parentheses.
Board 1
Gold: Hikaru Nakamura (8.74), Seattle
Silver: Sergey Erenburg (8.58), Baltimore
Bronze: Jaan Ehlvest (7.09), Tennessee
Board 2
Gold: Alex Lenderman (13.96), Queens
Silver: Dean Ippolito (9.66), New Jersey
Bronze: Josh Friedel (8.47), San Francisco
Board 3
Gold: Angelo Young (9.13), Chicago
Silver: Sam Shankland (8.99), San Francisco
Bronze: Mackenzie Molner (7.18), New Jersey
Board 4
Gold: Eric Rodriguez (8.80), Miami
Silver: Marc Esserman (6.77), Boston
Bronze: Daniel Naroditsky (6.38), San Francisco
Labels:
2008,
top board honors,
united states chess league
Power Rankings - Sharma and Lime and Ham(ming)
Arun Sharma and I both do Power Rankings every week. I decided to do a comparison on how close they match up. I believe his are done entirely by hand, but mine are done only using mathematical formulas.
I used a variation of a Hamming Distance to calculate the similarity. Instead of binary comparisons between teams, I used the absolute value of the difference each of us gave for a ranking. For example, if he ranked Carolina 7th and I ranked it 5th, then I would use |5-7| or 2 as a component of the Hamming distance. The sum of these comparisons equals a value. The lower the value, the more similar our rankings are.
For example, let's look at week 6.
The Hamming Distance for Week 6 was 10, which means that, on average, our ranks were 10/14 or 0.71 ranks different from each other.
Here are the Hamming distances of each of the six weeks. As you might expect, the early weeks (with less data) are more different than the later weeks.
Week 1: 36 (avg diff: 2.57)
Week 2: 18 (avg diff: 1.29)
Week 3: 16 (avg diff: 1.14)
Week 4: 6 (avg diff: 0.43)
Week 5: 12 (avg diff: 0.86)
Week 6: 10 (avg diff: 0.71)
For the last five weeks (I'm discarding the first week's power rankings due to lack of data), the teams on which we have had the most different rankings have been Carolina and Seattle. Arun has consistently ranked Carolina lower than I have, by an average of 2.00 ranks. For Seattle, I have ranked Seattle lower on three weeks, and higher on two weeks, but again, we have ranked them an average of 2.00 ranks apart.
On the other hand, Arun and I have ranked New Jersey and Miami very similarly for the past five weeks. For both, there was only one week where we were different, and we were only different by one rank in that week.
If you have specific questions, please ask them in the comments.
I used a variation of a Hamming Distance to calculate the similarity. Instead of binary comparisons between teams, I used the absolute value of the difference each of us gave for a ranking. For example, if he ranked Carolina 7th and I ranked it 5th, then I would use |5-7| or 2 as a component of the Hamming distance. The sum of these comparisons equals a value. The lower the value, the more similar our rankings are.
For example, let's look at week 6.
Week 6 | AS | BL | Diff |
QUE | 1 | 1 | 0 |
SFM | 2 | 2 | 0 |
NJK | 3 | 3 | 0 |
DAL | 4 | 4 | 0 |
CAR | 7 | 5 | 2 |
MIA | 6 | 6 | 0 |
CHI | 9 | 7 | 2 |
SEA | 5 | 8 | 3 |
BOS | 8 | 9 | 1 |
ARI | 10 | 10 | 0 |
PHI | 11 | 11 | 0 |
BAL | 13 | 12 | 1 |
TEN | 12 | 13 | 1 |
NYK | 14 | 14 | 0 |
Sum: | 10 |
The Hamming Distance for Week 6 was 10, which means that, on average, our ranks were 10/14 or 0.71 ranks different from each other.
Here are the Hamming distances of each of the six weeks. As you might expect, the early weeks (with less data) are more different than the later weeks.
Week 1: 36 (avg diff: 2.57)
Week 2: 18 (avg diff: 1.29)
Week 3: 16 (avg diff: 1.14)
Week 4: 6 (avg diff: 0.43)
Week 5: 12 (avg diff: 0.86)
Week 6: 10 (avg diff: 0.71)
For the last five weeks (I'm discarding the first week's power rankings due to lack of data), the teams on which we have had the most different rankings have been Carolina and Seattle. Arun has consistently ranked Carolina lower than I have, by an average of 2.00 ranks. For Seattle, I have ranked Seattle lower on three weeks, and higher on two weeks, but again, we have ranked them an average of 2.00 ranks apart.
On the other hand, Arun and I have ranked New Jersey and Miami very similarly for the past five weeks. For both, there was only one week where we were different, and we were only different by one rank in that week.
If you have specific questions, please ask them in the comments.
Labels:
2008,
power rankings,
united states chess league
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)